------ Register to get rid of these "In Post" ads! ------


In Outlook 2003, I could tailor my taskpad to see "Active Tasks for selected
days", which I grouped by priority.

I can't seem to do that Outlook 07, so have settled for the "To-Do List"
view in Tasks, and I'd like to tailor that view so the Today/Tomorrow/Next
Week groupings have a Priority grouping below them.

Whatever I do, I don't seem to be able to keep the Today/Tomorrow/Next week
groups and have a priority sub-group.

Can anyone tell me how to do this?

If it's not possible, can anyone suggest an alternative?

------ Register to get rid of these "In Post" ads! ------


> Whatever I do, I don't seem to be able to keep the Today/Tomorrow/Next
> week
> groups and have a priority sub-group.
How do you have configured things right now?
What happens instead? For instance; does it work for a few hours and then it
resets?

--
Robert Sparnaaij [MVP-Outlook]
Coauthor, Configuring Microsoft Outlook 2003
http://www.howto-outlook.com/
Outlook FAQ, HowTo, Downloads, Add-Ins and more

http://www.msoutlook.info/
Real World Questions, Real World Answers

-----

"NetPomme" <NetPomme@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:831B4F6D-EAC8-44D3-BAA6-8808829E521C@microsoft.com...
> In Outlook 2003, I could tailor my taskpad to see "Active Tasks for
> selected
> days", which I grouped by priority.
>
> I can't seem to do that Outlook 07, so have settled for the "To-Do List"
> view in Tasks, and I'd like to tailor that view so the Today/Tomorrow/Next
> Week groupings have a Priority grouping below them.
>
> Whatever I do, I don't seem to be able to keep the Today/Tomorrow/Next
> week
> groups and have a priority sub-group.
>
> Can anyone tell me how to do this?
>
> If it's not possible, can anyone suggest an alternative?

------ Register to get rid of these "In Post" ads! ------


Hi, thank you for responding.

(OL07 Tasks) I start with the default To Do List view (recently Reset). Then
select: View, Current View, Customise Current View.

- If I select Group By (defaulted to None) there is a checkbox selected
"Automatically group according to arrangement" which I have to uncheck before
I can access any of the Grouping options, and I think this destroys the
Arrange by Today/Tomorrow, etc arrangement.

- If I go into Sort (defaulted to Due Date) and add Priority as the second
sort option, click OK, OK, return to Outlook, I end up with all tasks listed
(and most likely sorted the way I specified but the Arrangement grouping is
lost - at the top it says "Arrange By: Custom". I have right-clicked over the
heading and checked that the "Show in Groups" option is ticked.

If I create a new view, Sorted by Start Date then Priority, the dates are
all individual (not Today/Tomorrow/etc). I want the date clustering rather
than individual day by day, but I want to see priorites within those days

"Roady [MVP]" wrote:

> > Whatever I do, I don't seem to be able to keep the Today/Tomorrow/Next
> > week
> > groups and have a priority sub-group.
> How do you have configured things right now?
> What happens instead? For instance; does it work for a few hours and then it
> resets?
>
> --
> Robert Sparnaaij [MVP-Outlook]
> Coauthor, Configuring Microsoft Outlook 2003
> http://www.howto-outlook.com/
> Outlook FAQ, HowTo, Downloads, Add-Ins and more
>
> http://www.msoutlook.info/
> Real World Questions, Real World Answers
>
> -----
>
> "NetPomme" <NetPomme@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
> news:831B4F6D-EAC8-44D3-BAA6-8808829E521C@microsoft.com...
> > In Outlook 2003, I could tailor my taskpad to see "Active Tasks for
> > selected
> > days", which I grouped by priority.
> >
> > I can't seem to do that Outlook 07, so have settled for the "To-Do List"
> > view in Tasks, and I'd like to tailor that view so the Today/Tomorrow/Next
> > Week groupings have a Priority grouping below them.
> >
> > Whatever I do, I don't seem to be able to keep the Today/Tomorrow/Next
> > week
> > groups and have a priority sub-group.
> >
> > Can anyone tell me how to do this?
> >
> > If it's not possible, can anyone suggest an alternative?
>
>